Each student shall prepare and give before the class a PowerPoint
presentation approximately 15 minutes in length.  The presentation will focus on a real event
concerning a corporate or organizational (governmental, religious, etc.)  The first part of the presentation shall be
a history lesson of actually what happened.

  The second part of the paper
is more abstract.  It asks you to go
back in time to just before the actual event happened.  You are to assume that you are the head of
the corporation’s/organization’s ethics department.  The corporation’s/organization’s board has
assigned you to present to it an ethical analysis of the organization’s
proposed course of action.  Of course,
the course of action is the event that actually happened but for purposes of
presentation you have to assume the event has not happened yet.

I. 
 PowerPoint in Lieu of Term Paper

II. 
Topic – 10 Points:  Find any corporate or organizational “screw
up” that actually happened or find an actual event in which a corporation or
organization actually did the “right thing.” 
You can go deep into history if you like.

III. 
Outline – 20 Points:

A. 
Identify at least three research sources – 5
points

B. 
Outline following Part IV below – 15 points

IV. 
Body of the Presentation – 170 points:

A. 
Give us a History Lesson of the “screw up” or
the “right thing”

1. 
Identify the name of the company or organization
– 5 points.

2. 
Identify the date of the “screw up” or “right
thing” – 5 points.

3. 
State the facts of what happened – 20 points.

4. 
NOTE – History lesson should be based on at
least two sources.

B. 
Shift Gears to Before the Event Happened

1. 
 Present
the factual situation – 10 points.

2. 
Present five business tactics the board is
considering – 5 points.

3. 
Of the five, identify the specific business
tactic the board is asking you to analyze – 5 points.

4. 
State the dilemma presented by the tactic – 10
points.

5. 
Identify key issues to think about when
considering the dilemma – 10 points.

6. 
Identify probable responses to each key issue
identified – 10 points.

7. 
Of the probably responses, develop “but what if”
to each probable responses – 10 points.

8. 
Answer the five ethical questions – 50 points.

9. 
Make a recommendation concerning whether you
think the proposed course of action is ethical or unethical under utilitarian
and deontological approaches – 10 points.

10. 
If you recommend the proposed action is
unethical, then explore whether there are changes the board can make to the
business tactic to ethical – 10 points.

11. 
If you recommend the proposed action is ethical,
there will still be some people who will be harmed or will not benefit as much
from the decision.  Suggest some changes
the board can make to ameliorate some of those harmed or not benefitted as much
by the decision -10 points.

12. 
Professionalism of presentation – 10 points.

V. 
 Professionalism of Presentation – 10 points

A. 
Use of Proper English

B. 
Aesthetics of Presentation

i. 
Don’t use plain white slides.

ii. 
Incorporate a photo or two.

iii. 
Incorporate a map to give us some idea where the
event happened.

iv. 
Include portion of a real world article, video
of audio concerning the real event.

C. 
Citations to the Sources in History Part of
Paper

VI. 
Try to Have Fun and Enjoy Yourself

If you have any questions please ask

1. Create an overview of your chosen market domain based on the previous week’s research. This overview will be a survey of the domain holistically in order to describe the marketplace of your chosen market domain and the factors contributing to its development. For example, if you chose the transportation industry and focused on ground transposition, you would discuss the development of the rail or interstate highway systems, the concept of intermodal transportation, deregulation, environment laws, and so forth. You will describe the impact on the marketplace of these new developments and leadership’s response. For additional details, please refer to the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric document in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course.

2. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

3. Institution Release Statement

4. I understand that SafeAssign will check this assignment against several databases for original content and that it will produce an originality report which my instructor and I can view. This report will show how my paper compares to documents available on the Internet, in many print journals, a database of other papers submitted by SNHU students, as well as a Global Database of papers submitted by all users of SafeAssign at other schools.I understand that SafeAssign will add my paper to the SNHU SafeAssign database for comparison of future papers against my work. I also understand that if I select I agree to submit my paper to the Global Reference Database below, I am agreeing to have my paper stored in a Global Database of submission so that my work will be used to compare future work of myself and other students who use the SafeAssign system. I understand that submitting my paper to the Global Database is completely voluntary. I maintain ownership of the original intellectual property created, but this document must remain a part of the SafeAssign Institutional and Global Databases.

The topic I selected is the Fifth Amendment. I want to know more about the protection against self-incrimination that’s stated in the Fifth Amendment. “No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself” (Constitution of the United States, 1791). I know the accused is protected, but what about witnesses? Unlike the accused, witnesses are typically subpoenaed to testify in court. Once on the witness stand, can witnesses remain silent? At a trial, witnesses are called to the witness stand to answer certain questions, if answering the questions would implicate them in a crime to the case being tried, can witnesses remain silent, since the testimony seem it would be incriminating?

Reference: Constitution of the United States. (1791). Retrieved from https://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm#amdt_5_1791

Research paper assignment requirements:

Cover page — (I think the title paper should be labeled as the Fifth Amendment).

Abstract — 200 to 300 word preview of the research ( I’m not sure which way to go; should it state all the rights of the Fifth Amendment or only the protection against self-incrimination)?

Thesis statement — Is the right to remain silent a right to witnesses or only to the accused in a court of law? (I’m not sure where this thesis statement should be placed in my paper).

Body of paper between 5 and 7 pages in length with a conclusion.

Citation/reference page, 4 to 5 scholarly references — (Miranda v. Arizona case plus court proceedings and any other court cases or scholarly references that will help support my thesis statement as well as my research paper)

Chronic Disease Health Promotion and Maintenance/for adults age 35–65

Chronic Disease

Pick One chronic disease from the list below. Write a 2–3-page paper discussing the concepts of health promotion, health maintenance, health restoration and health teaching to an adult patient with this chronic disease. Be sure to integrate Evidence Based Practice into your discussion.

• Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
• Hypertension
• Coronary Artery Disease
• Diabetes Mellitus
• Rheumatoid Arthritis
• Heart Failure
• Depression
• Thyroid Disease

To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section under Course Resources.

Assignment Requirements

Before finalizing your work, you should:

• be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above)
• consult the Grading Rubric (under Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary
• utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors

Your writing Assignment should:

• follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)
• be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful
• display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics
• use APA 6th Edition format for organization, style, and crediting sources.

How to Submit

Submit your Assignment to the unit Dropbox before midnight on the last day of the unit.

When you are ready to submit your Assignment, click the Dropbox tab and select this unit’s basket from the dropdown menu, then attach your file. Make sure to save a copy of your work and be sure to confirm that your file uploaded correctly.

Name: Violet | Female | Age: 58 | Height 66″ | Weight: 140 lb | Body Fat %: 21%

Violet is a vibrant, young 58-year-old woman. She has led a healthy, active lifestyle since her early 30’s. She has noticed a gradual increase in body weight in the last few years, which does not please her. She has also noticed a small decrease in strength, especially upper body strength. Describe in detail a training program that will improve Violet’s general fitness level and allow her to remain a strong, independent woman. In your answer include the number of days per week you will train this client, the types of exercises she will be performing, the number of sets & repetitions you deem appropriate, and any other programming recommendations you feel will benefit her. Include citations of the research you based your recommendations on and explain why you feel this will be the best course of action to take with this client.